| 李冠楠,魏华,杜凯,邹涛.孕产妇社会支持量表中文版信效度检验[J].四川精神卫生杂志,2020,33(3):268-271.Li Guannan,Wei Hua,Du Kai,Zou Tao,Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Maternity Social Support Scale[J].SICHUAN MENTAL HEALTH,2020,33(3):268-271 |
| 孕产妇社会支持量表中文版信效度检验 |
| Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Maternity Social Support Scale |
| 投稿时间：2019-08-26 |
| DOI：10.11886/scjsws20190826001 |
| 中文关键词: 孕产妇社会支持量表 信度 效度 心理测量 |
| 英文关键词:Maternity Social Support Scale Reliability Validity Psychological measurement |
| 基金项目:贵州省科技厅自然联合基金（项目名称：促发产后抑郁关键时点激素水平变化的研究，项目编号：黔科合LH字［2015］7411号） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 翻译孕产妇社会支持量表中文版（MSSS）并进行信效度分析。方法 对515名孕产妇进行MSSS评定，在515名孕产妇中随机选取120名于一个月后进行重测。在剩余的395名中随机选取100名孕产妇进行社会支持评定量表（SSRS）、爱丁堡产后抑郁量表（EPDS）、简易应对方式量表（SCSQ）中的积极应对因子测评，对MSSS评分与SSRS、EPDS、SCSQ评分进行相关分析。结果 ①MSSS各条目评分与总评分的相关系数为0.50~0.73，条目评分的相关系数为0.10~0.53；量表的Cronbach’s α系数为0.75，一个月后重测信度r=0.71。②MSSS评分与SSRS、SCSQ中的积极应对方式因子评分呈正相关（r=0.42、0.33，P均<0.01）；与EPDS评分呈负相关（r=-0.43，P<0.01）。③验证性因子分析显示数据拟合较好，RMSEA=0.09，TLI=0.89，GFI=0.964，AGFI=0.906，IFI=0.933。结论 MSSS中文版具有较好的信效度，可以简便快捷地用于孕产妇社会支持程度的评估。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To evaluate the reliability and validity of the translated Chinese version of Maternity Social Support Scale (MSSS).Methods MSSS assessment was performed with 515 pregnant women first, after one month, current study randomly selected 120 pregnant women from previous sample for follow up tests. Another 100 women were randomly selected from the remaining 395 women and also completed assessment of positive coping factors in Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and Simple Coping Style Scale (SCSQ). The correlation analysis was conducted between MSSS score and SSRS, EPDS and SCSQ scores.Results ① The correlation coefficient between each item of MSSS and the total score were 0.50~0.73, and the correlation coefficient between each two items were 0.10~0.53. The Cronbach’s α of the scale was 0.75, and the retest reliability after one month was 0.71. ② The score of MSSS was positively correlated with SSRS (r=0.42, P< 0.01) and positive coping factor score in SCSQ (r=0.33, P< 0.01) , however it was negatively correlated with EPDS score (r=-0.43, P<0.01). ③ Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the data fit well, RMSEA=0.09, TLI=0.89, GFI=0.964, AGFI=0.906, IFI=0.933.Conclusion The Chinese version of MSSS has good reliability and validity, which can be used to evaluate the social support of pregnant women easily and quickly. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
|
|
|