肖茜,张道龙.ICD-11与DSM-5关于应激相关障碍诊断标准的异同[J].四川精神卫生杂志,2020,(4):368-372.
ICD-11与DSM-5关于应激相关障碍诊断标准的异同
Similarities and differences between the diagnostic criteria of ICD-11 and DSM-5 for stress-related disorders
投稿时间:2020-06-24  
DOI:10.11886/scjsws20200624001
中文关键词:  ICD-11  DSM-5  应激相关障碍  诊断标准
英文关键词:ICD-11  DSM-5  Stress-related disorders  Diagnostic criteria
基金项目:湖南省自然科学基金青年基金项目(项目名称:反刍思维中心认知行为治疗对青少年抑郁症患者的临床症状改善研究,项目编号:2018JJ3832)
作者单位邮编
肖茜 中南大学湘雅医院心理卫生中心湖南 长沙 410008 410008
张道龙 北京华佑精神康复医院北京 102200 102200
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      本文目的是对《国际疾病分类(第11版)》(ICD-11)和《精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第5版)》(DSM-5)这两套诊断系统中应激相关障碍的诊断标准异同进行比较。应激相关障碍与暴露于应激源或创伤事件直接相关,造成个体情绪、认知以及行为的一系列改变和功能损害。本文通过对两套诊断系统中应激相关障碍诊断特征的异同进行探讨,以期增进精神心理工作者对两套诊断系统相应内容的理解。
英文摘要:
      This study aims to compare the diagnostic criteria for stress-related disorders in the International Classification of Diseases, eleventh edition (ICD-11) and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fifth edition (DSM-5). Stress-related disorders are directly related to the exposure to stressors or traumatic events, resulting in a series of emotional, cognitive and behavioral changes and functional impairment. The similarities and differences of diagnostic criteria for stress-related disorders in the two systems are discussed, in order to assist psychiatric and psychological professionals to learn the corresponding contents thoroughly in the two diagnostic manuals.
      附件
查看全文  HTML  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭
手机扫一扫