傅育敏,吴冬梅,杨蕾,唐以薰,何昌九,岳玉川.精神障碍患者及家属病耻感与主观幸福感的相关性[J].四川精神卫生杂志,2021,34(5):448-453.Fu Yumin,Wu Dongmei,Yang Lei,Tang Yixun,He Changjiu,Yue Yuchuan,Correlation between stigma and subjective well-being of patients with mental disorders and their matched family members[J].SICHUAN MENTAL HEALTH,2021,34(5):448-453
精神障碍患者及家属病耻感与主观幸福感的相关性
Correlation between stigma and subjective well-being of patients with mental disorders and their matched family members
投稿时间:2021-03-31  
DOI:10.11886/scjsws20210331001
中文关键词:  精神障碍  患者  家属  病耻感  主观幸福感
英文关键词:Mental disorders  Patients  Family members  Stigma  Subjective well-being
基金项目:四川省科技厅项目(项目名称:基于隐马尔可夫模型的精神分裂症患者攻击发展分类及预测研究(面上),项目编号:2018JY0306);四川省护理科研课题计划项目(项目名称:成都市精神康复资源现状与对策分析,项目编号:H20006)
作者单位邮编
傅育敏 成都市第四人民医院四川 成都 610036 610036
吴冬梅 成都市第四人民医院四川 成都 610036 610036
杨蕾 成都医学院护理学院四川 成都 610083 610083
唐以薰 成都市第四人民医院四川 成都 610036 610036
何昌九 成都市第四人民医院四川 成都 610036 610036
岳玉川 成都市第四人民医院四川 成都 610036 610036
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      目的 了解精神障碍患者及其共同居住家属的病耻感与主观幸福感现状,分析其相关性,并探索同一家庭中患者及其家属主观幸福感受病耻感影响的差异。方法 选取2019年10月-11月在成都市某三甲精神专科医院门诊就诊的精神障碍患者(n=154)及其家属(n=154)为研究对象,采用自编人口学资料调查表、自编精神疾病相关资料调查表、简明版精神疾病内在病耻感量表(ISMI-10)及幸福感指数量表(IWB)进行评定。结果 共有118名(76.62%)精神障碍患者和151名(98.05%)家属存在病耻感。家属ISMI-10总评分及各因子评分均高于患者(P均<0.01),IWB总评分及各因子评分均低于患者(P均<0.01);Pearson相关分析显示,患者及家属ISMI-10总评分与IWB总评分均呈负相关(r=-0.600、-0.202,P<0.05或0.01)。多元线性回归分析显示,在控制精神障碍患者人口学及疾病相关变量后,回归模型拟合较好(校正R2=0.457),模型具有统计学意义(F=26.746,P<0.01)。精神障碍患者家属回归模型拟合较差(校正R2=0.035),在控制家属人口学变量后,模型具有统计学意义(F=3.769,P<0.01)。结论 精神障碍患者的病耻感水平低于其家属,而主观幸福感高于家属。患者及家属的病耻感与主观幸福感密切相关。精神障碍患者病耻感是主观幸福感的重要影响因素。
英文摘要:
      Objective To understand the status of stigma and subjective well-being of patients with mental disorders and co-resident family members, to analyze the correlation between them, and to compare the impact of stigma upon the subjective well-being of patients and family members of the same household.Methods Patients with mental disorders (n=154) and their families (n=154) who visited the outpatient department of a tertiary psychiatric hospital in Chengdu from October to November 2019 were selected, and four instruments were used for collecting the data, including self-designed demographic information questionnaire, self-designed disease-related information questionnaire, brief version of Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI-10) and Index of Well-Being Scale (IWB).Results A total of 118 (76.62%) patients with mental disorders and 151 (98.05%) family members experienced stigma. The total score and each factors score in ISMI-10 of family members were higher than those of patients (P<0.01), and the total score and each dimension score in IWB were lower than those of patients (P<0.01). Pearson correlation analysis showed that ISMI-10 total score of patients and family members was negatively correlated with IWB total score (r=-0.600,-0.202, P<0.05 or 0.01). After controlling demographic and disease-related variables, multiple linear regression analysis showed that the regression model of mental disorder patients achieved good fit effect (adjusted R2=0.457), with statistical significance (F=26.746, P<0.01), while the regression model of co-living family members was lack of fit (adjusted R2=0.035). After controlling for family demographic variables, the model was at the statistical level (F=3.769, P<0.01).Conclusion Mental disorder patients have low illness stigma and high subjective well-being, whereas the opposite is true for family members. Moreover, there is a negative relationship between stigma and subjective well-being for both patients and family members, stigma is a significant factor affecting subjective well-being for people with mental disorders.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭