傅育敏,吴冬梅,杨蕾,唐以薰,何昌九,岳玉川.精神障碍患者及家属病耻感与主观幸福感的相关性[J].四川精神卫生杂志,2021,34(5):448-453.Fu Yumin,Wu Dongmei,Yang Lei,Tang Yixun,He Changjiu,Yue Yuchuan,Correlation between stigma and subjective well-being of patients with mental disorders and their matched family members[J].SICHUAN MENTAL HEALTH,2021,34(5):448-453 |
精神障碍患者及家属病耻感与主观幸福感的相关性 |
Correlation between stigma and subjective well-being of patients with mental disorders and their matched family members |
投稿时间:2021-03-31 |
DOI:10.11886/scjsws20210331001 |
中文关键词: 精神障碍 患者 家属 病耻感 主观幸福感 |
英文关键词:Mental disorders Patients Family members Stigma Subjective well-being |
基金项目:四川省科技厅项目(项目名称:基于隐马尔可夫模型的精神分裂症患者攻击发展分类及预测研究(面上),项目编号:2018JY0306);四川省护理科研课题计划项目(项目名称:成都市精神康复资源现状与对策分析,项目编号:H20006) |
|
摘要点击次数: |
全文下载次数: |
中文摘要: |
目的 了解精神障碍患者及其共同居住家属的病耻感与主观幸福感现状,分析其相关性,并探索同一家庭中患者及其家属主观幸福感受病耻感影响的差异。方法 选取2019年10月-11月在成都市某三甲精神专科医院门诊就诊的精神障碍患者(n=154)及其家属(n=154)为研究对象,采用自编人口学资料调查表、自编精神疾病相关资料调查表、简明版精神疾病内在病耻感量表(ISMI-10)及幸福感指数量表(IWB)进行评定。结果 共有118名(76.62%)精神障碍患者和151名(98.05%)家属存在病耻感。家属ISMI-10总评分及各因子评分均高于患者(P均<0.01),IWB总评分及各因子评分均低于患者(P均<0.01);Pearson相关分析显示,患者及家属ISMI-10总评分与IWB总评分均呈负相关(r=-0.600、-0.202,P<0.05或0.01)。多元线性回归分析显示,在控制精神障碍患者人口学及疾病相关变量后,回归模型拟合较好(校正R2=0.457),模型具有统计学意义(F=26.746,P<0.01)。精神障碍患者家属回归模型拟合较差(校正R2=0.035),在控制家属人口学变量后,模型具有统计学意义(F=3.769,P<0.01)。结论 精神障碍患者的病耻感水平低于其家属,而主观幸福感高于家属。患者及家属的病耻感与主观幸福感密切相关。精神障碍患者病耻感是主观幸福感的重要影响因素。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective To understand the status of stigma and subjective well-being of patients with mental disorders and co-resident family members, to analyze the correlation between them, and to compare the impact of stigma upon the subjective well-being of patients and family members of the same household.Methods Patients with mental disorders (n=154) and their families (n=154) who visited the outpatient department of a tertiary psychiatric hospital in Chengdu from October to November 2019 were selected, and four instruments were used for collecting the data, including self-designed demographic information questionnaire, self-designed disease-related information questionnaire, brief version of Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale (ISMI-10) and Index of Well-Being Scale (IWB).Results A total of 118 (76.62%) patients with mental disorders and 151 (98.05%) family members experienced stigma. The total score and each factors score in ISMI-10 of family members were higher than those of patients (P<0.01), and the total score and each dimension score in IWB were lower than those of patients (P<0.01). Pearson correlation analysis showed that ISMI-10 total score of patients and family members was negatively correlated with IWB total score (r=-0.600,-0.202, P<0.05 or 0.01). After controlling demographic and disease-related variables, multiple linear regression analysis showed that the regression model of mental disorder patients achieved good fit effect (adjusted R2=0.457), with statistical significance (F=26.746, P<0.01), while the regression model of co-living family members was lack of fit (adjusted R2=0.035). After controlling for family demographic variables, the model was at the statistical level (F=3.769, P<0.01).Conclusion Mental disorder patients have low illness stigma and high subjective well-being, whereas the opposite is true for family members. Moreover, there is a negative relationship between stigma and subjective well-being for both patients and family members, stigma is a significant factor affecting subjective well-being for people with mental disorders. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |