抑郁症患者的决策行为及其与抑郁焦虑症状的关系
Decision-Making Behavior in Major Depressive Disorder Patients and Its Relationship with Depressive and Anxiety Symptoms
投稿时间:2024-06-14  修订日期:2024-10-29
DOI:
中文关键词:  抑郁症  决策行为  概率翻转学习  抑郁焦虑症状
英文关键词:【Keywords】Major depressive disorder  Decision behavior  Probability reversal learning  Depression and anxiety symptoms
基金项目:抑郁症目标导向-习惯学习系统异常及其神经机制
作者单位地址
王昱翔 西南医科大学附属医院 西南医科大学附属医院忠山院区心身医学科
张罗雅 西南医科大学附属医院 
张毛毛 西南医科大学附属医院 
邓娟 西南医科大学 
彭彦杰 西南医科大学 
成晓彤 绵阳市第三人民医院 
刘可智 西南医科大学附属医院 
雷威 西南医科大学附属医院 
陈晶* 西南医科大学附属医院 西南医科大学附属医院忠山院区心身医学科
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      【摘要】抑郁症患者常表现出决策功能受损。目前,抑郁症患者决策能力与抑郁焦虑症状的关系尚不清楚。目的 探讨抑郁症患者的决策行为特征,并分析其与临床症状的关系。方法 纳入2020年10月—2023年5月于西南医科大学附属医院心身医学科就诊的、符合《精神障碍诊断与统计手册(第4版)》(DSM-Ⅳ)抑郁症诊断标准的48例患者为抑郁组。同期在泸州招募与抑郁组年龄性别相匹配的志愿者52名为对照组。采用贝克抑郁自评量表(BDI)、贝克焦虑自评量表(BAI)评估受试者抑郁和焦虑症状,并通过概率翻转学习(PRL)任务考查受试者的决策行为特征,分析指标包括达标试次、固执错误、赢后保持率、输后转移率等。采用Spearman相关分析BDI评分及BAI评分与PRL指标间的相关性。结果 抑郁组的输后转移率高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=3.684,P<0.01);两组PRL任务达标试次、固执错误和赢后保持率比较,差异均无统计学意义(t=0.329、0.132、0.609,P均>0.05)。相关分析结果显示,抑郁症患者BDI和BAI评分与赢后保持率均呈正相关(r=0.450、0.398,P均<0.01)。结论 抑郁症患者在面对负性结果时更倾向于改变选择策略;患者的抑郁和焦虑症状越严重,其在得到正反馈后越倾向于维持已有决策。 【关键词】抑郁症;决策行为;概率翻转学习;抑郁焦虑症状
英文摘要:
      【Abstract】 Background Patients with depression often exhibit impaired decision-making functions. The relationship between decision-making abilities and depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with depression remains unclear. Objective To explore the decision-making behavior characteristics of patients with depression and analyze their relationship with clinical symptoms. Methods The study included 48 patients diagnosed with depression according to DSM-IV criteria, seen at the Psychosomatic Medicine Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University from October 2020 to May 2023, as the depression group. A control group of 52 volunteers, matched for age and gender, was recruited in Luzhou. The Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) assessed depressive and anxiety symptoms. The Probabilistic Reversal Learning (PRL) task evaluated decision-making behaviors, analyzing indicators such as trials to criterion, perseverative errors, win-stay rate, and lose-shift rate. Spearman correlation analysis was used to assess the correlation between BDI and BAI scores and PRL indicators. Results The depression group showed a significantly higher lose-shift rate than the control group (t=3.684, P<0.01). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in trials to criterion, perseverative errors, and win-stay rate (t=0.329, 0.132, 0.609; all P>0.05). The correlation analysis showed that BDI and BAI scores were positively correlated with the win-stay rate in patients with depression(r=0.450, 0.398; both P<0.01). Conclusion Patients with depression are more inclined to change their choice strategies when faced with negative outcomes. The more severe their depressive and anxiety symptoms, the more likely they are to maintain existing decisions after receiving positive feedback. 【Keywords】Major depressive disorder; Decision behavior; Probability reversal learning; Depression and anxiety symptoms
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭