长春市新冠肺炎疫情前后心理援助热线来电特征与 接线员的应对策略
Research on the characteristics of calls from psychological assistance hotline and the coping strategies of operators before and after the outbreak of COVID-19 in Changchun City
投稿时间:2020-06-19  修订日期:2021-03-05
DOI:
中文关键词:  新型冠状病毒肺炎  心理援助热线  来电状况  应对策略
英文关键词:COVID-19  Psychological assistance hotline  Call status  Coping strategies
基金项目:
作者单位邮编
郑晓华 吉林省长春市第六医院 
方 芳 吉林省长春市第六医院 
杨 丽 吉林省长春市第六医院 
王思萌 吉林省长春市第六医院 
付立平 吉林省长春市第六医院 
祁一单 吉林省长春市第六医院 
刘 琦 吉林省长春市第六医院 
刘 洋 吉林省长春市第六医院 
房 禹 吉林省长春市第六医院 
陈 新 吉林省长春市第六医院 
张 雁 吉林省长春市第六医院 
郝琳琳 东北师范大学心理学院 
彭冰 东北师范大学心理学院 
郑晔 东北师范大学应用心理学院 
桑 红* 吉林省长春市第六医院 130052
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      目的 探讨新冠肺炎疫情前后心理援助热线来电特征与接线员的应对策略,提高心理危机热线援助能力。方法 对长春市心理援助热线信息登记平台记录的疫情前(2019年1月20日-2019年4月20日)和疫情期间(2020年1月20日-2020年4月20日)来电资料的人口学特征、来电问题、应对策略、来电时段态势等信息进行回顾性研究。结果 不同性别、年龄、婚姻状况、归属地、职业类型来电者在疫情前与疫情期间的差异均有统计学意义(2=11.205、234.240、152.083、265.458、353.385,P均<0.01)。不同求助问题的次数在疫情前与疫情期间的差异具有统计学意义(2=185.088,P<0.01),接线员的不同应对策略次数在疫情前与疫情期间的差异有统计学意义(2=226.810,P<0.01)。疫情前来电主高峰集中在16至18时,次峰集中在20至23时;疫情发生后来电主高峰同样集中在16至18时,而次峰却集中在9至12时。结论 疫情期间选择了拨打心理援助热线的主要人群为30~40?岁已婚家庭成员及老年群体;疫情初期主要表现为心理应激反应,8周后个别来电呈现退缩回避行为;疫情期间接线员在使用倾听技术的基础上,针对不同个体提供专业的稳定化技术,发现、整合来电者的自身资源,对某些伴有生物学改变的来电者提供必要的转介。
英文摘要:
      Objective: Discuss features of Psychological Assistance Hotline Calls and operators' Coping Strategies of before and after the COVID-19 outbreak, in order to further improve the ability of psychological crisis hotline assistance. Methodology: conduct retrospective research based on the demographics, call problems, coping strategies, and call time trends of the records of the information registration platform for the psychological assistance hotline before the epidemic in Changchun City (January 20, 2019-April 20, 2019) and during the epidemic period (January 20, 2020-April 20, 2020). Results: The differences between gender, age, marital status, location, and occupation type before and during the epidemic were statistically significant (2=11.205, 234.240, 152.083, 265.458, 353.385, all P<0.01). The number of different help calls had a statistically significant difference before and during the epidemic (2=185.088,P<0.01). The difference in the number of operators’ different response strategies before and during the epidemic was statistically significant (2=226.810, P<0.01). Before the epidemic, the main peak of incoming calls was concentrated at 16:00 to 18:00, and the secondary peak was concentrated at 20:00 to 23:00. During the epidemic, the main peak of incoming calls was also concentrated at 16:00 to 18:00, while the secondary peak was concentrated at 9:00 to 12:00. Conclusion: During the epidemic, the main groups who chose to call the psychological assistance hotline were married family members of 30-40 years old and the elderly; The initial manifestation of the epidemic was mainly psychological stress, and individual calls showed withdrawal and avoidance behavior after 8 weeks; Based on the listening technology, operators provided professional and stabilized technologies for different individuals. In addition, they found and integrated the caller's own resources to provide necessary referrals to certain callers with biological changes.
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭