陈豪诚,周萍,张敏,周华斌,柳娜,张宁.高危服刑人员冲动性特点与其儿童期虐待的相关研究[J].四川精神卫生杂志,2021,34(2):158-163.Chen Haocheng,Zhou Ping,Zhang Min,Zhou Huabin,Liu Na,Zhang Ning,Study on relationship between impulsivity and childhood abuse of high-risk inmates[J].SICHUAN MENTAL HEALTH,2021,34(2):158-163 |
高危服刑人员冲动性特点与其儿童期虐待的相关研究 |
Study on relationship between impulsivity and childhood abuse of high-risk inmates |
投稿时间:2021-01-04 |
DOI:10.11886/scjsws20210104002 |
中文关键词: 高危服刑人员 冲动性 儿童期虐待 |
英文关键词:High-risk inmates Impulsivity Childhood abuse |
基金项目:国家自然科学基金(项目名称:AMPA型谷氨酸受体辅助亚基TARP r-8调控暴力攻击行为的机制研究,项目编号:81901390);国家自然科学基金(项目名称:品行障碍者冷漠特质的催产素干预作用及遗传机制研究,项目编号:81501637);江苏省研究生实践创新项目(项目名称:服刑人员冲动性与OXTR基因多态性及甲基化的关联研究,项目编号:SJCX19_0332) |
|
摘要点击次数: |
全文下载次数: |
中文摘要: |
目的 了解高危服刑人员冲动性的特点及其影响因素,为识别服刑人员冲动性的高危因素并进行有效干预提供参考。方法 以南京市某监狱588名男性服刑人员为研究对象,按暴力犯罪案由、高冲动性、边缘型人格及反社会人格为特点将其分为四组,收集服刑人员一般人口学资料和犯罪信息,采用自编物质使用情况调查表、Barratt冲动性量表第11版(BIS-11)和儿童期虐待问卷(CTQ-SF)进行调查,采用多元逐步回归对高危服刑人员冲动性的影响因素进行分析。结果 ①四组高危服刑人员的年龄、婚姻状况、毒品使用史比较差异均有统计学意义(F=4.890、13.945、26.137,P均<0.01);②四组服刑人员BIS-11及CTQ-SF评分差异有统计学意义(F=81.196、16.208,P均<0.01);③毒品使用史(β=1.832,P<0.05)、情感忽视(β=0.278,P<0.01)及情感虐待(β=0.307,P<0.01)对整体高危服刑人员的冲动性具有正向预测作用,情感忽视(β=0.482,P<0.01)对暴力犯罪服刑人员的冲动性具有正向预测作用。结论 毒品使用史、情感忽视、情感虐待是男性高危服刑人员高冲动性的危险因素。 |
英文摘要: |
Objective To understand the characteristics of high-risk inmates’ impulsivity and to explore the influencing factors of impulsivity, so as to provide a theoretical basis for identifying the high-risk factors and making effective intervention.Methods A total of 588 male inmates in Nanjing were selected as the research subjects. They were divided into four groups according to their violent crime reasons, high impulsiveness, borderline personality and antisocial personality. The detailed criminal records of inmates, general demographic data questionnaire, self-made substance use questionnaire, Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11) and Childhood Trauma Questionaire-Short Form (CTQ-SF) were used to investigate, and multiple stepwise regression analysis was conducted to analysis the influencing factors of impulsivity of high-risk inmates.Results ① There were statistically significant differences in age, marital status and drug use history among the four groups (F=4.890、13.945、26.137, P<0.01). ② There were statistically significant differences in BIS-11 and CTQ-SF scores among the four groups (F=81.196, 16.208, P<0.01). ③ Drug use history (β=1.832, P<0.05), affective neglect (β=0.278, P<0.01) and affective abuse (β=0.307, P<0.01) had positive predictive effects on impulsivity of all high-risk inmates. Affective neglect (β=0.482, P<0.01) had a positive predictive effect on impulsivity of violent criminals.Conclusion Drug use history, affective neglect and emotional abuse were the risk factors for high impulsivity in male high-risk inmates. |
查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
关闭 |