| 代文武,李兆岚,贾宁.元认知疗法与元认知训练的回顾与展望[J].四川精神卫生杂志,2022,35(2):171-177.Dai Wenwu,Li Zhaolan,Jia Ning,Review and prospect of metacognitive therapy and metacognitive training[J].SICHUAN MENTAL HEALTH,2022,35(2):171-177 |
| 元认知疗法与元认知训练的回顾与展望 |
| Review and prospect of metacognitive therapy and metacognitive training |
| 投稿时间：2021-09-29 |
| DOI：10.11886/scjsws20210929001 |
| 中文关键词: 元认知疗法 元认知训练 CiteSpace 可视化分析 |
| 英文关键词:Metacognitive therapy Metacognitive training CiteSpace Visualization analysis |
| 基金项目:河北省教育厅人文社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目（项目名称：河北省中小学心理素质提升研究，项目编号：ZD202109）；河北师范大学在读研究生创新能力培养资助项目（项目名称：元认知监控视角下提取项目特征、知晓感对提取时间分配的影响及眼动机制，项目编号：CXZZSS2022021） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 了解元认知疗法和元认知训练的研究现状、研究热点和关键文献特征，探究二者研究路径上的异同及未来研究方向。方法 利用CiteSpace软件对Web of Science数据库2011年-2020年收录的以“元认知疗法”和“元认知训练”为主题的文献进行可视化分析。结果 ①元认知疗法研究中的核心和高被引作者均为Adrian Wells，元认知训练研究中的核心和高被引作者均为Steffen Moritz，而Aaron T Beck则是在两种技术研究中都出现的高被引作者；②研究热点分析表明，元认知疗法和元认知训练研究都主要体现在“技术的成熟与拓展”“技术的效果评估与检验”以及“技术间的对比分析”；③关键文献特征分析表明，二者均涉及“效果”“有效性”“元分析”“变式”这四个方面。结论 2011年-2020年元认知疗法和元认知训练的研究均凸显出各自的核心研究者，在研究热点和关键文献特征上既存在相同之处，又各具特点。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To analyze the current research status， research hotspots and main features of the literature related to metacognitive therapy and metacognitive training， and to explore the similarities and differences in research approaches of the two intervention techniques and their research directions in the future.Methods Citespace-based visualization analysis was carried out on the relevant literature of "metacognitive therapy" and "metacognitive training" published in 2011-2020 in the Web of Science database.Results ① Adrian Wells was the core author and the author of highly cited papers in the research field of metacognitive therapy. Steffen Moritz is the core author and the author of highly cited papers in the research field of metacognitive training. Aaron T Beck was a highly cited researcher in both fields. ② The analysis of research hotspots showed that the two intervention techniques were mainly reflected in the "maturity and expansion of techniques"， "the evaluation and testing of the effects of techniques" and "the comparative analysis of techniques". ③ The key literature characteristics analysis showed that both techniques involved the aspects of "effectiveness"， "validity"， "meta-analysis" and "variation".Conclusion Both metacognitive therapy and metacognitive training studies in 2011-2020 highlight their respective core researchers， with similarities and distinctive features in terms of research hotspots and key literature features. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |