杨帆,钟潇,冯春梅,陈刚.后疫情时期广安市残疾人抑郁、焦虑症状检出率及其相关因素分析[J].四川精神卫生杂志,2022,35(3):266-271.Yang Fan,Zhong Xiao,Feng Chunmei,Chen Gang,Prevalence and influencing factors of depression and anxiety symptoms in disabled people in Guang'an during the post-pandemic period[J].SICHUAN MENTAL HEALTH,2022,35(3):266-271
后疫情时期广安市残疾人抑郁、焦虑症状检出率及其相关因素分析
Prevalence and influencing factors of depression and anxiety symptoms in disabled people in Guang'an during the post-pandemic period
投稿时间:2022-02-25  
DOI:10.11886/scjsws20220225002
中文关键词:  残疾人  心理健康  抑郁  焦虑  相关因素
英文关键词:Disabled people  Mental health  Depression  Anxiety  Related factor
基金项目:国家级大学生创新创业训练计划资助项目(项目名称:社会治理视角下陪读家长心理状况及干预研究,项目编号:S201910619017)
作者单位邮编
杨帆 广安市精神病院四川 广安 638000 638000
钟潇 北京体育大学心理学院北京 100089 100089
冯春梅 广安市精神病院四川 广安 638000 638000
陈刚 广安市精神病院四川 广安 638000 638000
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      目的 了解后疫情时期广安市残疾人抑郁焦虑症状检出率及其相关因素,为促进残疾人心理健康提供参考。方法 于2021年4月-5月,选取调查前半年时间内居住地均属低风险地区、且符合《残疾人残疾分类和分级》国家标准(GB/T26341-2010)的广安市残疾人为调查对象,通过问卷星平台,采用患者健康问卷抑郁量表(PHQ-9)和广泛性焦虑量表(GAD-7)评定残疾人抑郁和焦虑症状,并通过二元Logistic回归分析其抑郁及焦虑的危险因素和保护因素。结果 残疾人的中重度和重度抑郁症状检出率分别为9.05%和8.35%,中度和重度焦虑症状检出率分别为9.40%和11.25%。回归分析结果显示,失业或待业是残疾人抑郁和焦虑的危险因素(OR=2.354、2.353,P均<0.01);未婚(OR=0.418)、已婚(OR=0.414)、视力残疾(OR=0.254)、肢体残疾(OR=0.460)、家庭功能良好(OR=0.241)、家庭功能中度障碍(OR=0.288)、生活完全自理(OR=0.062)和部分自理(OR=0.416)是残疾人抑郁的保护因素(P<0.05或0.01);视力残疾(OR=0.382)、听力残疾(OR=0.143)、肢体残疾(OR=0.432)、家庭功能良好(OR=0.246)、家庭功能中度障碍(OR=0.402)、生活完全自理(OR=0.093)和部分自理(OR=0.378)是残疾人焦虑的保护因素(P<0.05或0.01)。结论 后疫情时期广安市残疾人抑郁、焦虑症状的检出率较高,失业或待业的残疾人出现抑郁、焦虑症状的风险更高,而良好的家庭功能、有完全或部分自理能力则有利于残疾人的心理健康。
英文摘要:
      Objective To investigate the prevalence rate and influencing factors of depression and anxiety in disabled people in Guang'an during the post-pandemic period, so as to provide references for promoting mental health of disabled people.Methods From April to May 2021, the disabled people dwelling in low-risk areas for coronavirus infections in Guang'an for half a year and met the criteria outlined in Classification and Grading Criteria of Disability (GB/T26341-2010) were selected as the survey subjects, and their depression and anxiety symptoms were evaluated via the Patients' Health Questionnaire Depression Scale-9 item (PHQ-9) and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7) through Wenjuanxing platform. Then binary Logistic regression analysis was performed to screen the risk and protective factors for depression and anxiety in disabled people.Results The detection rates of moderate-to-severe and severe depressive symptoms were 9.05% and 8.35%, and the detection rates of moderate and severe anxiety symptoms were 9.40% and 11.25%. Regression analysis denoted that being laid-off and job-waiting were risk factors for depression and anxiety in disabled people (OR=2.354, 2.353, P<0.01). Being unmarried (OR=0.418), married (OR=0.414), visual disability (OR=0.254), limb disability (OR=0.460), good family function (OR=0.241), moderate family dysfunction (OR=0.288), complete self-care (OR=0.062) and partial self-care (OR=0.416) were protective factors for depression in disabled people (P<0.05 or 0.01). Visual disability(OR=0.382), hearing disability(OR=0.143), limb disability(OR=0.432), good family function (OR=0.246), moderate family dysfunction (OR=0.402), complete self-care (OR=0.093) and partial self-care (OR=0.378) were protective factors for anxiety in disabled people (P<0.05 or 0.01).Conclusion The disabled people in Guang'an during the post-pandemic period suffer a high detection rate of depression and anxiety, and the detection rate is even higher among those being laid-off or job-waiting, while good family function and complete or partial self-care ability are conducive to protecting the mental health of the disabled.
查看全文  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭