| 黎勇航,覃金英,李文轩,朱进才,郭华贵,古璇,黄炜,黎雪松.不同服刑期的男性服刑人员心理防御机制与家庭环境的关系[J].四川精神卫生杂志,2022,35(3):272-276.Li Yonghang,Qin Jinying,Li Wenxuan,Zhu Jincai,Guo Huagui,Gu Xuan,Huang Wei,Li Xuesong,Relationship between defense style and family environment among male prisoners of different terms of imprisonment[J].SICHUAN MENTAL HEALTH,2022,35(3):272-276 |
| 不同服刑期的男性服刑人员心理防御机制与家庭环境的关系 |
| Relationship between defense style and family environment among male prisoners of different terms of imprisonment |
| 投稿时间：2021-12-14 |
| DOI：10.11886/scjsws20211214002 |
| 中文关键词: 已服刑期 男性服刑人员 家庭环境 防御方式 |
| 英文关键词:Term of imprisonment Male prisoners Family environment Defense style |
| 基金项目:广东省佛山市医学类科技攻关项目（项目名称：佛山市服刑人员生活质量相关因素研究，项目编号：201308123） |
|
| 摘要点击次数: |
| 全文下载次数: |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 调查不同服刑期的男性服刑人员心理防御机制及其家庭环境状况，分析其心理防御机制与家庭环境的关系。方法 于2015年4月-6月采用随机数字表法抽取广东省某监狱的男性服刑人员200名作为研究对象，并根据其服刑期，将服刑人员分为已服刑5年以下组（n=108）和5年及以上组（n=92），采用防御方式问卷（DSQ）和家庭环境量表中文版（FES-CV）评定其防御方式和家庭环境情况。采用Pearson相关分析检验各量表评分间的相关性。结果 已服刑5年以下组DSQ不成熟防御机制与中间型防御机制因子评分均低于已服刑5年及以上组，差异均有统计学意义（t=4.198、1.137，P均<0.01）。已服刑5年以下组FES-CV亲密度、情感表达和组织性因子评分均高于已服刑5年及以上组（t=3.122、2.993、2.203，P均<0.01），矛盾性因子评分低于已服刑5年及以上组（t=-3.682，P<0.01）。男性服刑人员DSQ不成熟防御机制、中间型防御机制及掩饰因子评分与FES-CV的亲密度和情感表达因子评分均呈负相关（r=-0.428~-0.172，P<0.05或0.01），DSQ的4个因子评分与FES-CV的矛盾性因子评分均呈正相关（r=0.175~0.384，P<0.05或0.01）。结论 相较于已服刑5年以下的男性服刑人员，已服刑5年及以上者表现出更多的不成熟和中间型心理防御机制，其家庭环境呈现更高程度的矛盾性，更低程度的亲密度、情感表达与组织性；服刑人员的心理防御机制缺陷与其家庭环境相关。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To explore the psychological defense styles and family environment among male prisoners of different terms of imprisonment， and to analyse the relationship between their psychological defense styles and family environment.Methods A total of 200 male prisoners in a prison in Guangdong were randomly selected from April to June 2015， and they were classified into less than 5 years of imprisonment group （n=108） and 5 years or more imprisonment group （n=92）. Their defense style and family environment were evaluated by Defense Style Questionnaire （DSQ） and Family Environment Scale-Chinese Version （FES-CV）. Pearson correlation analysis was used to test the correlation between each scale score.Results The factor scores of immature defense mechanism and intermediate defense mechanism of DSQ in the group with less than 5 years of imprisonment were lower than those in the group with 5 years or more imprisonment， with statistically significant differences （t=4.198， 1.137， P<0.01）. The scores of FES-CV family intimacy， emotional expression and organizational factors in less than 5 years of imprisonment group were higher than those in 5 years or more imprisonment group （t=3.122， 2.993， 2.203， P<0.01）， and the scores of contradiction factors were lower than those in 5 years or more imprisonment group （t=-3.682， P<0.01）. The scores of DSQ immature， intermediate defense mechanism and concealment factor of male prisoners were negatively correlated with the scores of FES-CV family intimacy and emotional expression factor （r=-0.428~-0.172， P<0.05 or 0.01）， and the scores of 4 factors in DSQ were all positively correlated with the scores of contradiction factor in FES-CV （r=0.175~0.384， P<0.05 or 0.01）.Conclusion Compared with male prisoners with less than 5 years of imprisonment， those with 5 years or more are prone to adopt immature and intermediate defense mechanisms， and their family environments are characterized by apparent contradiction and a lack of family intimacy， emotional expression and organization. Furthermore， the defects of psychological defense mechanism of prisoners are related to their family environment. |
| 查看全文 查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |