双相情感障碍共病BPD患者认知功能损害分析[ ]
Analysis of cognitive impairment in BPD patients with bipolar affective disorder
投稿时间:2023-04-26  修订日期:2023-10-24
DOI:
中文关键词:  双相情感障碍  边缘型人格障碍  认知功能损害
英文关键词:Bipolar affective disorder  Borderline personality disorder  Cognitive impairment
基金项目:河北省2022年度医学科学研究课题(项目名称:双相情感障碍与双相情感障碍共病边缘型人格障碍患者的认知功能比较;项目编号:20221407)
作者单位地址
王朝敏* 河北医科大学第一医院 精神卫生科&
amp
#160
河北 石家庄&
amp
#160
050031 
河北省石家庄市东岗路89号
辛  博 河北医科大学第一医院 精神卫生科 
河北 石家庄 
050031 
李  娜 河北医科大学第一医院 精神卫生科 
河北 石家庄 
050031 
张  坤 河北医科大学第一医院 精神卫生科 
河北 石家庄 
050031 
薛  华 河北医科大学第一医院 精神卫生科 
河北 石家庄 
050031 
王金成 河北医科大学第一医院 精神卫生科 
河北 石家庄 
050031 
安翠霞 河北医科大学第一医院 精神卫生科 
河北 石家庄 
050031 
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      【摘要】目的 探讨双相情感障碍与双相情感障碍共病边缘型人格障碍(BPD)患者认知功能损害程度差异。方法 选取2021年4月至2022年4月在河北医科大学第一医院治疗的双相情感障碍共病BPD患者60例作为观察组,其中双相抑郁共病BPD患者33例,双相躁狂共病BPD患者27例。同时选取双相情感障碍患者60例作为对照组,其中双相抑郁35例,双相躁狂25例。采用中文版重复性成套神经心理状态测验(RBANS)和Stroop色词测验评估比较两组患者的认知功能。结果 观察组RBANS评估中,即刻记忆、视觉广度、言语功能和测验总分分别为(62.33±11.22)分、(66.72±8.40)分、(77.28±9.97)分和(67.28±9.94)分,低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组Stroop色词测验中,单字时间、单色时间、双字时间和双色时间分别为(15.10±2.28)s、(20.10±3.11)s、(16.76±2.08)s和(36.61±7.22)s,高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组和对照组双相抑郁患者RBANS评估中即刻记忆、视觉广度、言语功能和测验总分,Stroop色词测验中单字时间、单色时间、双字时间和双色时间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组和对照组双相躁狂患者RBANS评估中言语功能和测验总分,Stroop色词测验中单字时间、单色时间、双字时间和双色时间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组双相抑郁和双相躁狂患者RBANS评估、Stroop色词测验比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 相较于双相情感障碍患者,双相情感障碍共病BPD患者认知功能受损加重。
英文摘要:
      [Abstract]Objective: To explore the difference of cognitive impairment between bipolar affective disorder and bipolar affective disorder comorbid borderline personality disorder (BPD) patients. Methods: 60 patients with bipolar affective disorder comorbidity BPD who were treated in the First Hospital of Hebei Medical University from April 2021 to April 2022 were selected as the observation group, including 33 patients with bipolar depression comorbidity BPD and 27 patients with bipolar mania comorbidity BPD. At the same time, 60 patients with bipolar disorder were randomly selected as the control group, including 35 patients with bipolar depression and 25 patients with bipolar mania. The cognitive function was evaluated with the Chinese version of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status (RBANS) and Stroop Color Word Test. Results: In the RBANS evaluation of the observation group, the scores of immediate memory, visual span, speech function and test were (62.33 ± 11.22), (66.72 ± 8.40), (77.28 ± 9.97) and (67.28 ± 9.94), respectively, which were lower than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). In Stroop color word test, the time of single word, monochrome, double word and double color in the observation group were (15.10 ± 2.28) s, (20.10 ± 3.11) s, (16.76 ± 2.08) s and (36.61 ± 7.22) s, respectively, which were higher than those in the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). There were significant differences in patients with bipolar depression between the observation group and the control group in immediate memory, visual span, speech function and total scores of RBANS assessment, and single word time, monochrome time, double word time and double color time in Stroop color word test (P<0.05). There were statistically significant differences in bipolar mania patients between the observation group and the control group in the speech function and the total score of the RBANS assessment, and in the Stroop color word test in single word time, monochrome time, double word time and double color time (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in RBANS evaluation and Stroop color word test between bipolar depression and bipolar mania patients in the observation group (P>0.05). Conclusion: Compare with patients with bipolar affective disorder, patients with bipolar affective disorder comorbid BPD have more impaired cognitive function.
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭