慢性病排斥与歧视量表的汉化及其在维持性血液透析患者中的信效度检验
Chinesization of the Chronic Illness Rejection and Discrimination Scale and its reliability and validity test in patients with maintenance hemodialysis
投稿时间:2024-06-17  修订日期:2024-11-05
DOI:
中文关键词:  慢性病排斥与歧视量表  汉化  维持性血液透析  信度  效度
英文关键词:Chronic disease Exclusion and Discrimination Scale  Chinesization  Maintenance hemodialysis  Reliability  validity
基金项目:
作者单位地址
徐滢佳 湖北医药学院 湖北省十堰市人民南路30号
松洪谢 自贡市第一人民医院 
黄菲* 湖北医药学院 湖北省十堰市人民南路30号
李明雅 湖北医药学院 
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      摘要:背景 当前我国未见针对维持性血液透析患者歧视知觉特异性的测量工具,亟待汉化适用于测量维持性血液透析患者歧视知觉的测量工具,为及时评估维持性血液透析患者的歧视知觉提供评估工具。目的 汉化慢性疾病歧视知觉量表(CIRDS),为测评维持性血液透析患者的歧视知觉引进、验证适用性工具。方法 在征得原作者同意的情况下,按照 Brislin原则对其进行翻译、回译及跨文化调整,形成中文版慢性疾病歧视知觉量表。选取十堰市某三级甲等医院249例维持性血液透析的患者进行问卷调查,对其信度和效度进行分析。结果 探索性因子分析共提取2个公因子,保留11个条目,总变异贡献率达65.41%。中文版量表Cronbach’s α系数和折半信度分别为0.910和0.803,总重测信度为0.920;量表的每个构面的重测信度为0.852、0.874。所有条目的S-CVI和各条目I-CVI指数分别为0.900与0.880~1.000。结论 中文版CIRD量表具有良好信效度,可以作为测评国内维持性血液透析患者疾病歧视知觉的有效工具。
英文摘要:
      【Abstract】 Background At present, there is no specific measurement tool for the perception of discrimination in maintenance hemodialysis patients in China. It is urgent to develop a measurement tool for the perception of discrimination in maintenance hemodialysis patients in order to provide an evaluation tool for the timely evaluation of the perception of discrimination in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Objective To introduce and verify the applicability of the Chinese Chronic Disease Discrimination Perception Scale (CIRDS) to assess the perception of discrimination in maintenance hemodialysis patients. Methods With the consent of the original author, the Chinese version of the chronic disease discrimination perception Scale was developed through translation, back translation and cross-cultural adjustment according to the Brislin principle. The reliability and validity of 249 maintenance hemodialysis patients in a Grade A hospital in Shiyan City were analyzed by questionnaire survey. Results Two common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis and 11 common factors were retained. The total variation contribution rate was 65.41%. Cronbach's α coefficient and broken half reliability were 0.910 and 0.803, respectively, and the total retest reliability was 0.920. The retest reliability of each dimension of the scale was 0.852 and 0.874. The S-CVI index of all articles and the I-CVI index of all articles are 0.900 and 0.880~1.000, respectively. Conclusion The Chinese version of CIRD scale has good reliability and validity, and can be used as an effective tool to evaluate the perception of disease discrimination in maintenance hemodialysis patients in China.
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭