Dai Wenwu,Li Zhaolan,Jia Ning,Review and prospect of metacognitive therapy and metacognitive training[J].SICHUAN MENTAL HEALTH,2022,35(2):171-177
Review and prospect of metacognitive therapy and metacognitive training
DOI:10.11886/scjsws20210929001
English keywords:Metacognitive therapy  Metacognitive training  CiteSpace  Visualization analysis
Fund projects:河北省教育厅人文社会科学研究重大课题攻关项目(项目名称:河北省中小学心理素质提升研究,项目编号:ZD202109);河北师范大学在读研究生创新能力培养资助项目(项目名称:元认知监控视角下提取项目特征、知晓感对提取时间分配的影响及眼动机制,项目编号:CXZZSS2022021)
Author NameAffiliationPostcode
Dai Wenwu The College of Education of Hebei Normal University Shijiazhuang 050024 China 050024
Li Zhaolan The College of Education of Hebei Normal University Shijiazhuang 050024 China 050024
Jia Ning* The College of Education of Hebei Normal University Shijiazhuang 050024 China 050024
Hits:
Download times:
English abstract:
      Objective To analyze the current research status, research hotspots and main features of the literature related to metacognitive therapy and metacognitive training, and to explore the similarities and differences in research approaches of the two intervention techniques and their research directions in the future.Methods Citespace-based visualization analysis was carried out on the relevant literature of "metacognitive therapy" and "metacognitive training" published in 2011-2020 in the Web of Science database.Results ① Adrian Wells was the core author and the author of highly cited papers in the research field of metacognitive therapy. Steffen Moritz is the core author and the author of highly cited papers in the research field of metacognitive training. Aaron T Beck was a highly cited researcher in both fields. ② The analysis of research hotspots showed that the two intervention techniques were mainly reflected in the "maturity and expansion of techniques", "the evaluation and testing of the effects of techniques" and "the comparative analysis of techniques". ③ The key literature characteristics analysis showed that both techniques involved the aspects of "effectiveness", "validity", "meta-analysis" and "variation".Conclusion Both metacognitive therapy and metacognitive training studies in 2011-2020 highlight their respective core researchers, with similarities and distinctive features in terms of research hotspots and key literature features.
View Full Text   View/Add Comment  Download reader
Close