非药物干预对2型糖尿病患者抑郁症状改善效果的网状Meta分析
Efficacy of non-drug Interventions in alleviating depression symptoms in patients with type 2 diabetes: a network meta-analysis
投稿时间:2024-12-30  修订日期:2025-03-14
DOI:
中文关键词:  2型糖尿病  非药物干预  抑郁症状  网状Meta分析
英文关键词:Type 2 diabetes mellitus  Non-drug intervention  Depression symptoms  Network Meta-analysis
基金项目:四川省社会科学重点研究基地项目
作者单位地址
郑梦瑶 成都医学院 四川省成都市金牛区蓉都大道天回路601号成都医学院天回校区
吴冬梅 成都市第四人民医院 
刘鑫 成都医学院 
梁芳玲 成都医学院 
杜荟 成都医学院 
何昌九* 成都市第四人民医院 四川省成都市金牛区互利西一巷
摘要点击次数:
全文下载次数:
中文摘要:
      背景 2型糖尿病患者伴有抑郁症状时,会增加其并发症风险并影响疾病预后。非药物干预作为药物治疗的重要补充,有助于改善患者的抑郁症状,但不同干预方式的效果差异尚缺乏系统评价。目的 采用网状Meta分析的方法评价7种非药物干预方式对2型糖尿病患者抑郁症状的改善效果,为2型糖尿病患者抑郁症状的干预策略提供循证依据。方法 计算机检索中国知网、万方数据知识服务平台、维普数据库、中国生物医学文献数据库、PubMed、Embase、EBSCO、Cochrane Library、ScienceDirect和Web of Science数据库,按照纳入及排除标准收集非药物干预改善2型糖尿病患者抑郁症状的随机对照试验,检索时间为建库至2024年11月29日。由两名研究者筛选文献、提取资料并进行文献偏倚风险评估,采用Stata 17.0进行数据分析,以标准均数差(SMD)及95% CI为效应指标,比较各干预方式之间的效果差异,并进行效果排序。结果 共纳入55篇文献,涉及7种非药物干预方式,共9 144例2型糖尿病患者。网状Meta分析结果显示,与常规干预组相比,穴位疗法(SMD=-1.25,95% CI:-1.72~-0.78)、综合护理干预(SMD=-1.13,95% CI:-1.45~-0.82)、放松疗法(SMD=-1.15,95% CI:-1.82~-0.48)、正念疗法(SMD=-1.02,95% CI:-1.61~-0.44)、认知行为疗法(SMD=-0.62,95% CI:-0.87~-0.37)、运动疗法(SMD=-0.61,95% CI:-0.99~-0.22)、健康教育(SMD=-0.60,95% CI:-0.94~-0.25)在改善2型糖尿病患者抑郁症状方面差异均有统计学意义(P均<0.05)。在干预效果方面,曲线下累计排序概率面积(SUCAR)由高到低依次为穴位疗法、综合护理干预、放松疗法、正念疗法、认知行为疗法、运动疗法和健康教育。结论 穴位疗法在7种非药物干预方法中改善2型糖尿病患者抑郁症状效果最佳,其次为综合护理干预和放松疗法。
英文摘要:
      Background The presence of depressive symptoms in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) increases their risk of complications and adversely affects disease prognosis. As an important supplement to pharmacological treatment, non-drug interventions contribute to improving depressive symptoms among these patients. However, systematic evaluations of the effectiveness of different non-drug interventions are lacking. Objective To evaluate and compare the efficacy of seven non-drug interventions in improving depressive symptoms among patients with T2DM using network Meta-analysis and to provide evidence-based recommendations for intervention strategies. Methods We conducted a computerized search of CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, CBM, PubMed, Embase, EBSCO, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, and Web of Science databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on non-drug interventions for depressive symptoms in T2DM patients, according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. The search period was from the databases' inception to November 29, 2024. Two researchers screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. Data analysis was performed using Stata 17.0, with the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI as effect indicators to compare the effectiveness among interventions and rank them. Results A total of 55 studies were included, involving 9,144 patients with type 2 diabetes and examining seven types of non-drug interventions, were included in the analysis. The results of the network Meta-analysis revealed that compared with the conventional intervention group, acupuncture therapy (SMD=-1.25, 95% CI: -1.72~-0.78), comprehensive nursing intervention (SMD=-1.13, 95% CI: -1.45~-0.82), relaxation therapy (SMD=-1.15, 95% CI: -1.82~-0.48), mindfulness-based therapy (SMD=-1.02, 95% CI: -1.61~-0.44), cognitive-behavioral therapy (SMD=-0.62, 95% CI: -0.87~-0.37), exercise therapy (SMD=-0.61, 95% CI: -0.99~-0.22), and health education (SMD=-0.60, 95% CI: -0.94~-0.25) (all P<0.05). Regarding their effectiveness, the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) ranked the interventions from highest to lowest: acupuncture therapy, comprehensive nursing intervention, relaxation therapy, mindfulness-based therapy, cognitive-behavioral therapy, exercise therapy, and health education. Conclusion Acupuncture therapy was the most effective among the seven non-drug interventions in alleviating depressive symptoms in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, followed by comprehensive nursing interventions and relaxation therapy.
  查看/发表评论  下载PDF阅读器
关闭